TL;DR -- Memorial Day will be a main theme for a while, especially as the 8+ years associated with the 250th unfold in the foreseable future. We ran into Genealogy Trails today (again) and were intrigued for many reasons that we discuss. Of course, we love the "retro" look which isn't; rather, this site has been consitent over the years which we hope continues.
---
We may have run into this website before, in our 15 years of research. But, we honored there request for not using their data beyond personal research. Of course that brings up the question of including the site in the reference list.
As described below, looking at an Honors list for a State with casualties expeience during the Vietnam conflict found this site and got our interest. So, here is a link to the site prior to further exposition here: Genealogy Trails. Also, we note that we found this link via searches and backtracked at the site back to the starting page. Too, we noted the 2026 update of the Copyright.
Incidently, we love that they have continued the older format. Why? The cute methods brought by the use of 'tAIn't methods is irritating. Underneath, there are table-like structures that get filled in. Then, there is some rearranging (within limits) for some semblance customization. But all of the sites using the ML approach look and feel the same. Actually, the convergence to a norm seems to be an apropos description.
On the other hand, our portal notes our intent to foster and support "bespoke" methods in software. So, we're slow about it. Well, that's the human way. Those that run after the quick modes allowed by computation are perpetuating something that will not be pleasant in the future once the underlying errors start to creep up and bear out their potentials for negative influence.
Okay, this year the discussion on Memorial Day was about service during the time of the Vietnam conflict. In particular, known casualties were identified. And, "known" means classmate or other, as this is that time of year for classes from the past to meet (this year, it's the 50th of the class of 1966.
Where were you then? As we were searching using names, we were gathering reports, such as the "Honors" listings for Counties and their States. Given our normal approach, we then looked at New England heritage with a focus on Essex County of Massachusetts our ground zero.
Will not point to anything specific yet, but as we looked at the names New England families popped up. Lots of them. Well, let's use one example: Katy - western railroad. That was motivated by a postcard from early in the 1900s which was prior to the horseless approach. And, some of the buildings in the view had legible names. One name (Holbrook) popped out as it's part of an extended familythat we know. So, we followed up and reported the name of the owner/builder.
We will do the same for some of the Honorees that ought to get attention on Memorial Day. We might merely have a table of the name, location and the information from New England about ancestors. There is no specific plan as of now. This post is to raise the link to the site plus attempt to use it for research when we help people with the family history that matches up with names on the Honores lists.
Site: Genealogy Trails - this is sponsored by the
Genealogy Trails History Group
Their search engine: Our Freefind Search Engine
Page we landed on when doing our search:
U. S. MILITARY FATAL CASUALTIES OF THE VIETNAM WAR
FOR HOME-STATE-OF-RECORD: KANSAS
---
![]() |
| This weeks finds ... |
---
We will be using this genealogy trails site on a regular basis to check out material in the early stages of research where we would use Wikipedia and WikiTree early on just to see what work has been done on the topic. What we know of the modern computational system is that, done right, it will be a great boon. Unfortunately, there has been more bane than boon in my view for the past two decades. However, there are signs that some effort at maturity might be at hand.
Remarks: Modified: 05/25/2026
05/25/2026 --








